Friday, 6 November 2009

Thanet grammar school pupils the drug ecstasy, scientists and politicians, responsibility.

Looking at the local paper the Isle of Thanet Gazette today I notice the lead article is about local grammar school children who got caught with the drug ecstasy.

I hesitate to say from the scientific point of view, so I will say the shop assistants understanding of this drug is that it increases the amount of pleasure one experiences by causing chemical changes in the brain.

There has been a long argument between the government’s experts advisors and the government about the reclassification of ecstasy, mainly because when it was first classified it was very new and little was known about it.

In 2000, the UK Police Foundation recommended ecstasy should be transferred from Class A to Class B."

In 2002, the Home Affairs Committee of the UK House of Commons, recommended that it should be reclassified to a Class B drug.

In February 2009, the UK Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs recommended that it be re classified from a class A drug to a class B drug.

The frustration here from the experts point of view being that if you are going to have different classifications for different types of drug that relate to how dangerous they are, it is important that you put the drugs in the right category.

Let us suppose we were to put weapons into classes.

A: nuclear; biological; chemical.

B: guns; conventional bombs.

C: Swords; bows and arrows.

Legal: cooking knives, gardening implements and cutlery.

Make no mistake all of them can kill people, but from the scientists point of view the situation prevailing within the government with ecstasy, is like taking a high-powered modern air gun and putting it in class A to prevent all-out airgun warfare from wiping out the population of continents and possibly causing the end of the world.

The result of all of this has been to make an important scientific expert state that ecstasy is no more dangerous than alcohol or tobacco.

So how does all this effect Thanet school children, I suppose the answer to this one that most secondary school children at some time or another have tried a cigarette, now over the last few weeks a senior scientific advisor to the government has been saying that ecstasy is no more harmful that cigarettes.

The children in question have lost their grammar school places, somewhere along the line the scientific advice that was supposed to read, “don’t play with guns and bombs,” got changed to, “don’t play with your cutlery.”


  1. There were warrant raids some years ago in Thanet looking for a drugs processing activity which used two blackmarket anabolic steroids to manufacture "E" (or an "E" mimic)

    The raids allegedly failed and this resulted in an internal police inquiry into which police were associates of the suspects and the matter of advance warning to the suspects of the warrant raids.

    This, I am afraid, illustrates the irrationality of the category approach. If all drugs processors belonged to a professional body and guaranteed their product met the classification spec ? Obviously a nonsense.

    So we havea situation in which the health industry cannot make and market homeopathic remedies but any Tommy Ricky or Harry can push Lawd knowswhat as"E" knowing that the label alone guarantees a Cat 2 listing ?

  2. By the way I think the new Licensing Officer Cruttenden (well done) was on the ball re a recent licensed premises warrant raid in Ramsgate.


    Pauline Terry the licensee is allegedly the aunt of Emma Terry the widow of murder victim David O'Leary Lydden Lodge 2008.

  3. There is currently IPCC complaint against Kent Police re the hanlding of the David O'Leary murder case and a County Court action for damages about propertyy seized by police at the murder scene.

    I find it strange that the murder victim car was not forensically tested. A Rolex found at his home with face damage was not forensically tested but a letter sent to police by the aunt of his widow, in a licensing matter, got forensically tested

  4. Idiots no doubt.So detention?A lecture? Final warning?No let's see if we can screw up their futures.Very sad very predictable.


Please note comments that may be libellous, comments that may be construed as offensive, anonymous derogatory comments about real people, comments baiting internet trolls, comments saying that an anonymous comment was made by a named real person, boring comments and spam comments, comments in CAPs will be deleted. Playground stuff like calling real people by their time stamp or surname alone, referring to groups as gangs, old duffers and so on will result in deletion. Comment that may be construed as offensive to minority groups is not allowed here either, so think before you write it, remember that the internet is a public place, that it is very difficult to be truly anonymous and that everyone who uses it leaves a trail of some sort. Also note the facility to leave anonymous comment will be turned of during periods when I am unable to monitor comment, this will not affect people commenting who are signed on to their blogger accounts. When things are particularly difficult on the commercial spam front I may turn comment moderation on for periods.

If you feel that someone has left a comment that is offensive and directed at you personally please email me (link on the sidebar) asking to have it removed, you will need to tell which post and the date and timestamp of the offending comment. Please do not reply to the offending comment as I will assume you continuing the dialogue as meaning that you want the comments left there.