tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post2640959232253579196..comments2024-03-13T10:32:22.656+00:00Comments on thanetonline: Midweek Ramble Michael Childhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09499435016469020417noreply@blogger.comBlogger102125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-18201337661401962872013-09-24T02:14:44.815+01:002013-09-24T02:14:44.815+01:00Thank you for the information Peter, I may have a ...Thank you for the information Peter, I may have a read of it when I get 5 minutes, but as I say, I'm not a professional whiner, so don;t really seek out things to be offended about. That may exposure of liars, peons and occutards gains followers daily is touching, but not really noteworthy, read the "Smudger" piece, entertained at how inaccurate it is, and that the whispering "sources" are no doubt the anons that plague this blog aswell. <br /><br />Was nice to have something to laugh at for a while though. John Hamilton - talking sense and cutting through bullshithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04286883736579945122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-25781890955725993522013-09-23T08:22:53.065+01:002013-09-23T08:22:53.065+01:00PS. I'm surprised you didn't do a blog po...PS. I'm surprised you didn't do a blog post on your mention in this week's Isle of Thanet Gazette, but here it is in case you missed it:<br /><br />"John Hamilton", whoever he may be, should be afriad. Smnudger hears that no less a great personage than Kent's Police and Crime Commissioner Ann Barnes has been asked to investigate his blog site which has become home to a nasty array of personal attacks on Thanet folk. Smudger's sources whisper that Mr Hamilton may, in fact, be a member of the Thanet political community and exposure would be very embarassing for a certain party. Oh dear. Peter Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06283534498743254609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-5457516730463334882013-09-23T08:11:01.615+01:002013-09-23T08:11:01.615+01:00It's this one: http://bignewsmargate.blogspot...It's this one: http://bignewsmargate.blogspot.co.uk<br /><br />As for my "irrelevant" question, you're the one that claims you're not doing anything illegal with your postings. Of course, you could always email her direct, as you suggest other people do instead of posting things online: contactyourpcc@pcc.kent.pnn.police.ukPeter Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06283534498743254609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-59439046834221745012013-09-23T03:34:52.374+01:002013-09-23T03:34:52.374+01:00Well Peter, as I have no idea which his blog is, i...Well Peter, as I have no idea which his blog is, it is unlikely that I would be aware of any further detail of his political aspirations wouldn't it now. Unlike some, I don;t require a passport, birth certificate and CV from people posting online. <br /><br />As for your irrelevant question, it is simply that, irrelevant.John Hamilton - talking sense and cutting through bullshithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04286883736579945122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-33284938446922040402013-09-22T21:49:13.004+01:002013-09-22T21:49:13.004+01:00As Mr Flaig's blog is one of a handful that yo...As Mr Flaig's blog is one of a handful that you link to from your own blog I'm rather surprised that you're "not aware" of his electorial history... or is because he's a whining right-winger (despite calling himself a liberal) rather than a whining socialist? <br /><br />You didn't answer my question regarding Ann Barnes, any message for her in case she or the police are reading? Peter Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06283534498743254609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-41353093856269437592013-09-22T20:15:46.595+01:002013-09-22T20:15:46.595+01:00http://www.thefreedictionary.com/self-aggrandiseme...http://www.thefreedictionary.com/self-aggrandisementAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-36484550417318351882013-09-22T19:51:13.825+01:002013-09-22T19:51:13.825+01:00Nothing to comment on 7:09, maybe you'd like t...Nothing to comment on 7:09, maybe you'd like to make your name public and what comments are yours so we can discuss your irrelevance... ;)John Hamilton - talking sense and cutting through bullshithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04286883736579945122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-59504896782321290722013-09-22T19:48:59.987+01:002013-09-22T19:48:59.987+01:00I simply reply in the media that the BS I am comme...I simply reply in the media that the BS I am commenting on was published (don't have twitter though, it annoys me). If you think tweets and pictures of an open door are the cutting edge of social responsibility Peter, that is a matter for you. The fact that it is simply and obvious self engranishment is plain for all to see.<br /><br />Never really ended up on a blog or FB with Mr Flaig, nor am I aware of his electorial history. Not really sure why you think I should be mentioning each and every planning application, and local "politician" on every subject Peter. I am not a career whiner like many on the blogs and FB, hence I don't look for new and varied subjects to be outraged about.John Hamilton - talking sense and cutting through bullshithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04286883736579945122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-49260735915408209282013-09-22T19:09:42.446+01:002013-09-22T19:09:42.446+01:00"John" is suddenly behaving himself, may..."John" is suddenly behaving himself, maybe he's getting nervous!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-72193411912392217272013-09-21T11:19:05.917+01:002013-09-21T11:19:05.917+01:00I am not the Anon who was writing before but anoth...I am not the Anon who was writing before but another Anon who wrote after him.<br /><br />I not the Anon who writes on the thread but the one who writes on a whim. <br /><br />I may be the Anon who finds Holyer hard to take. <br /><br />I am not the Anon eating contaminated cake. <br /><br />I am not the Anon spitting from behind the grubby nets.<br /><br />I am the Anon who is as daft as it gets.<br /><br />Who am I? Why just a bit of a tit!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-42688445954404644732013-09-21T09:16:30.265+01:002013-09-21T09:16:30.265+01:00Anon 7:33, your grasp of what goes before gets wor...Anon 7:33, your grasp of what goes before gets worse. Having said I am not getting excited about being called silly names by some anonymous creep on a blog, I am hardly likely to rush off to court. Do pay attention, there's a good chap.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17927801279761727020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-57506281422560160102013-09-21T08:43:21.506+01:002013-09-21T08:43:21.506+01:00John, sorry, yes, I realised I spelt your name wro...John, sorry, yes, I realised I spelt your name wrong as soon as I had posted. Comments do not appear to have an edit facility here as on Facebook?Solo Gayshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11633808604885716801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-70590446169311581582013-09-21T07:40:44.472+01:002013-09-21T07:40:44.472+01:00Come on John, you know full well that blog posts a...Come on John, you know full well that blog posts are far more effective than private phone calls or emails. Otherwise you'd just send a private message to Ian Driver everytime you disagreed with his policies. <br /><br />As for them doing so badly in the polls, the same could be said of Tony Flaig (who probably did even worse) yet you never mention that. <br /><br />Anyway, do you have a public message for Ann Barnes in case she's reading? Or will you just give her a phone call? ; ) Peter Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06283534498743254609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-55444848688671154112013-09-21T01:03:48.789+01:002013-09-21T01:03:48.789+01:00Anon 7:38 pm
A post saying, "Your slime trai...Anon 7:38 pm<br /><br />A post saying, "Your slime trail is everywhere" registers my contempt for the obnoxious little creep who has infested this blog for months [Manston, aquifer 0%, etc, etc]<br /><br />I take that you intend to follow Michael's guidance. John Holyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02284672912775316883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-9956898101373421092013-09-21T00:56:45.968+01:002013-09-21T00:56:45.968+01:00Solo 9:36 pm,
So that was you - sorry. But at lea...Solo 9:36 pm,<br /><br />So that was you - sorry. But at least I did not accuse you of feeding the toilet duck. <br /><br />(You have mispelled my name).John Holyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02284672912775316883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-34941978919045813482013-09-21T00:51:30.694+01:002013-09-21T00:51:30.694+01:00Selective Peter... You mean I answered all the que...Selective Peter... You mean I answered all the queiries you raised, and illustrated why the likes of Driver and Oldfield serve no useful purpose for Thanet, and the people of Thanet properly demonstrated at the KCC elections, when a resounding 96% of the Thanet electorate presented them with a volumous FU. <br /><br />Oh yes, of course, a tweet about an open door, as opposed to a phone call, wonder why, oh yes, a phone attracts no attention to herself, and thus doesn't feed her narcissism.<br /><br />I wonder what the charge will be? Perhaps "exposing a liar with intent"... You're STILL a joke smithson. <br /><br />And no Michael, aswell as Driver, it appears you've backed another loser :)<br /><br />John Hamilton - talking sense and cutting through bullshithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04286883736579945122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-15825717514230246682013-09-21T00:41:35.986+01:002013-09-21T00:41:35.986+01:00Anon 7:28 pm 20 September,
You have mumbled to so...Anon 7:28 pm 20 September,<br /><br />You have mumbled to somebody or other, "I only posted one message and that was the one at 10:04. I'm afraid you are falling for Holyer's pack of lies about there only being one anonymous poster. It isn't true as I can testify." <br /><br />You are confused but this is usual. I appreciate that you have a short attention span and that you find it difficult to concentrate. What I said was that there is only one nutter posting and that nutter is you. If you do not realise how I know this then you are as dumb and disturbed as I imagine you to be.<br />John Holyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02284672912775316883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-63413157018963759672013-09-20T22:10:42.019+01:002013-09-20T22:10:42.019+01:00That girl is a bit young for him!That girl is a bit young for him!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-9975199877795149262013-09-20T21:36:17.287+01:002013-09-20T21:36:17.287+01:00lol 7:38. Your experience reminds me of my first ...lol 7:38. Your experience reminds me of my first interjection with John Hoyler as an anon: I thought I had made a rational observation based on experience, when he accused me of always standing on the clifftop throwing breadcrumbs at helicopters!Solo Gayshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11633808604885716801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-83437704684179025682013-09-20T21:31:28.917+01:002013-09-20T21:31:28.917+01:00I am still betting on this oneI am still betting on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmXS6vjhqeE" rel="nofollow">this</a> oneMichael Childhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09499435016469020417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-70851050955755990292013-09-20T21:25:27.925+01:002013-09-20T21:25:27.925+01:00Thank you Michael. I didn't realise that. I...Thank you Michael. I didn't realise that. I'm 7.38 by the way and not any of the others.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-42514268874458962192013-09-20T20:52:37.126+01:002013-09-20T20:52:37.126+01:00Really? What does it say?Really? What does it say?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-21398501220761816022013-09-20T20:39:27.856+01:002013-09-20T20:39:27.856+01:00John Hamilton even makes "smudger" in th...John Hamilton even makes "smudger" in the Gazette today.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-37365685951060887282013-09-20T20:30:25.078+01:002013-09-20T20:30:25.078+01:007.38 your solution is quite simple, when you comme...7.38 your solution is quite simple, when you comment select “name url” instead of “anonymous” and use a nom de blog, you can make this even more definitive by getting yourself a Google id, you don’t have to use your real name and compromise your employment you know. Michael Childhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09499435016469020417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-65529280545709266262013-09-20T20:21:09.838+01:002013-09-20T20:21:09.838+01:00From Twitter:
Duncan Smithson @DuncanS 2h
@marga...From Twitter:<br /><br />Duncan Smithson @DuncanS 2h<br />@margatearchi thought you would like to know @AnnBarnesKPCC is looking at #JohnHamilton for us. I hope you show your support :DAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com