tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post9190065163938058828..comments2024-03-13T10:32:22.656+00:00Comments on thanetonline: King just sane enough to make Ramsgate Castle GeorgianMichael Childhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09499435016469020417noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-3900271588319764622010-10-20T17:03:28.980+01:002010-10-20T17:03:28.980+01:00Gerald here is the rest of the document http://www...Gerald here is the rest of the document <a href="http://www.michaelsbookshop.com/1010/id7.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelsbookshop.com/1010/id7.htm</a> sorry I didn’t include it in the first place.Michael Childhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09499435016469020417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-81921479627788160192010-10-20T15:24:28.313+01:002010-10-20T15:24:28.313+01:00Michael,
Yes, it would interesting to see the sec...Michael,<br /><br />Yes, it would interesting to see the second page - I'd wondered when these houses were built, and by whom.<br /><br />I made a quick <a href="http://www.eastcliff.co.uk/castle/PierCastle.html" rel="nofollow">transcription</a> of this last night - this is not yet checked, so it probably still has several errors.<br /><br />I hadn't realised that the castle wasn't listed. Checking the planning applications I see now that the planning permission was for the castle and 1 and 2 Kent Terrace - whereas the listed building consent was only for 1 and 2 Kent terrace.Geraldnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-71251788553604565372010-10-20T11:44:55.054+01:002010-10-20T11:44:55.054+01:00Gerald 1 to 5 Royal Kent Terrace were I believe bu...Gerald 1 to 5 Royal Kent Terrace were I believe built between 1833 and 1837 and the rest were all there by 1849, the trouble is that the information about the building dates if these buildings is pretty scant.<br /><br />English Heritage reckon that most of the terrace was built before it actually was, so not much help there.<br /><br />You are right about the document there is a page 2 and of course you are welcome to give it a go.<br /><br />Don, the plans for the castle have already been passed and work seems to be underway.<br /><br />When it comes to listing I think this is probably down to us.Michael Childhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09499435016469020417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-33933974836481523132010-10-20T10:18:18.311+01:002010-10-20T10:18:18.311+01:00Interesting but what has that to do with the counc...Interesting but what has that to do with the councils decision? I am sure the council will let the building to take place. As for listing the castle I am sure it will be now it has been bought to the attention of those who go round doing that type of thing.On the councils planning department everyone's laptop is allergic to it.Don Woodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17099505939055955603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3575321478441277410.post-68815567788009930212010-10-20T10:02:58.334+01:002010-10-20T10:02:58.334+01:00Interesting document. I guess there must be a seco...Interesting document. I guess there must be a second page as it ends a bit abruptly ...<br /><br />As a matter of interest, there appears to have been a sale of property in Kent Terrace in the green area of the plan slightly earlier (in 1836). I'm not sure if this relates to when Kent Terrace was first built.Geraldnoreply@blogger.com