Monday, 20 October 2008

Something nasty in the water 2

I have published the environment agency’s letter to Rick click here to read it

The danger threshold limit value for Cyclohexanone is 20 parts per million, it can be absorbed through the skin, by inhalation or ingested, and we have a spillage involving 100s of tonnes of the stuff, which seems to have been covered up for years.

How on earth could such a large amount missing have gone unnoticed? Because of its nature you theoretically are not allowed to let it evaporate, I would hope that those people who advocate heavy industrial use on the source protection zones will reconsider their positions.

7 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. vice chairman of the Labour Party has described the scandal surrounding illegal donations to the party as a “policy failure” and called for a cap on the amount that individuals can donate.

    
 Dr Stephen Ladyman, MP for South Thanet, conceded the fiasco surrounding proxy donations made by property developer David Abrahams could be seen as incompetence by the Labour Party.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In answer yes the html you did is an accurate transcript of the EA letter.

    I just remembered I said I would not comment on the thread you start using the copy of the EA letter. Other than to confirm your copy accurate.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well done Rick,
    if i said any more
    ??????????????

    ReplyDelete
  5. This could be quite serious I take it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I do try to reply to people’s comments but this thing leaves me pretty much speechless, how any engineering firm could lose 500 tons of a toxic solvent without knowing, is beyond belief.

    No one I have asked seems to be able to tell me if the vapour is still coming out of the ground, if you use it in industry and the are more than 20 parts per million in the atmosphere, you have to suit up and use breathing apparatus.

    ReplyDelete

Comments, since I started writing this blog in 2007 the way the internet works has changed a lot, comments and dialogue here were once viable in an open and anonymous sense. Now if you comment here I will only allow the comment if it seems to make sense and be related to what the post is about. I link the majority of my posts to the main local Facebook groups and to my Facebook account, “Michael Child” I guess the main Ramsgate Facebook group is We Love Ramsgate. For the most part the comments and dialogue related to the posts here goes on there. As for the rest of it, well this blog handles images better than Facebook, which is why I don’t post directly to my Facebook account, although if I take a lot of photos I am so lazy that I paste them directly from my camera card to my bookshop website and put a link on this blog.