Having just put up the press release about impending council
tax rises, see
http://thanetpress.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/council-tax-announcement-thanet.html
several thoughts struck me, the main one being is that that I wouldn’t mind
paying more for good, fair and open local government here in Thanet.
With Thanet District Council £1,000,000 per year for them seems
to equate to about £8 per year for us council taxpayers and it seems the
council want to find an extra £580,000 next year, because the national
government is going to cut their grant.
I guess the old cry of no taxation without representation
may need looking at here, when it comes to making local decisions the
technology exists now for us to make them ourselves without representation.
With the party political system operating at a local level,
democracy doesn’t necessarily mean that you get what the word suggests. To me
this suggests a local person standing to represent the needs of the local area,
whereas in practice we get what the local Labour and Conservative parties chose
in terms of people to vote for.
A local person standing as an independent councillor
wouldn’t normally stand a cat in hell’s chance of making any difference to
anything much, the recent exception has been TIG and as most of the
conventional politicians seem to strongly dislike the members of TIG this is
interesting to us locals.
One way and another I guess there isn’t much at local level
we can do about the representation, so perhaps we should be asking for no
taxation without something else. What? Well I guess clear information about
what the council are up to on our behalf and with our money wouldn’t be a bad
starting point.
Issues that are of considerable interest to locals, produce bizarre
results when searched for on the council’s website, I just had a go with the
radar on the end of the pier issue that is causing such a stir in Ramsgate, see
http://thanetonline.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/councils-collide-over-ramsgate-harbour.html
bung radar into the council website’s search box and be mystified. I will
ramble on late I expect.
With the Royal Sands it was certainly
interesting to see a councillor being sceptical about the development in the
media, there is a similarity between the cabinet member responsible commenting
in 2007 here http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kentonline/newsarchive.aspx?articleid=32914
and the cabinet member responsible commenting this week here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-20071560
One point worth considering is that now after
all these years when we could have had a fun fair and or parking on most of the
site, the council are now saying that they are going to check to see whether
the company that wants to build it actually has the money to do so. Companies house
list SFP Ventures as having a net negative value of minus £859.
On to the local secondary school league tables which I had considerable difficulty locating and have copied off the BBC's website.
Sorry the table is a bit wide in most browsers it will work better on the BBC website by clicking on this link
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/education/school_tables/secondary/11/html/bacc_886.stm?compare=8865438+8865462+8864118+8865460+8865468+8864120+8866906+8865463+8865428+8865447+8864633 i guess you only have to look at the link to understand the difficulties.
having done that i realise that the links to the explanatory notes on the BBC's website don't work so have copied the whole thing to a conventional website here is the link
http://www.michaelsbookshop.com/1012/id9.htm the BBC may not like me doing this so I may have to remove it.
This came up because of today’s news item saying new
teachers would have to pass rigorous maths and English exams, this seemed to me
to be muddled thinking by the government as it does little to address problems with
existing teachers and raises some questions about people like art teachers like,
would you rather have an art teacher who can draw than one who can do quadratic
equations?
There is a simple answer to the problem which is the
teachers sit the exams with the pupils they have taught and their results are
taken into account, both when marking their pupils results and when considering
whether they should stay teaching a particular subject.
I had a very busy day in my bookshop today, I put this down
to there now being so few independent shops in Thanet and there being virtually
no non food shops left where the items for sale are generally cheaper than the
internet.
The business of leisure shop browsing is changing very
rapidly at the moment and many shopping experiences are not so good, I ran out
of bubble wrap the other day, I usually buy it on ebay in large rolls last time
300 metres for £16.99 inc vat and shipping. Buying it at £4.59 for 3 metres in
Smiths the only remaining option in Ramsgate seemed more than a bit steep.
New High Street and shopping centre book buying is rapidly
degenerating into browsing either Smiths or Waterstones, finding the book you
want, pointing the camera of your mobile at the barcode and pressing the buy it
now button.
This takes a lot of the fun out of shopping and returning
home with your purchases and of course ultimately is heading towards disaster.
I think it is about time Margate found a blogger to replace
Tony as I am sure this issue should have been covert on the Thanet Blogs.
minus £859 that meams I must be able to fund loads of similr developments, Fancy being a business partner Michael?
ReplyDeleteDon did you mean you or them, things as you may have noticed in the retail world are not so good at the moment, with bookshops there is the added problem of internet sales and the Kindle, this left me with one of two business plans, one being to win the lottery the other was to be cheaper than the competition.
DeleteAt the moment we are going with second plan, however £3.6m does look like a bargain price for the main and most prominent site in the Ramsgate and I do have more than minus £859 on me at the moment, as I guess you do, so perhaps we could ask the council for an option on the site and then try and sell it for the ten to fifteen million I would think it is worth having done this we could pay off the council and split the roughly ten million.
Being a partner to SFP doesn’t look like such a good deal.
Its ironic that in Margate TDC want to buy a site and in Ramsgate they want to sell one. Do they need the cash from one to pay for the other?
ReplyDeleteIt also occured to me that when the new ferry starts next year this will bring additional port fees into the coffers of TDC that they had not planned for. Any ideas of how much this will be?