So here is the painting of The Sun Hotel in Canterbury
And here the photo from the loo in Canteen (a useful café on
three floors with good quality food)
And here the books I bought for my bookshop in Canterbury
today.
Once again apologies for the lack of contentious posts at
the moment, this has been partly due to the council turning the shop opposite
me into social housing, which has been very noisy making it hard to concentrate. God
alone knows what type of poverty crime would have to be involved to wind up living in a flat with bedroom windows next to the pavement in King Street, where the
takeaways are licensed to stay open until 4am, abject doesn’t get halfway
there.
On the politics front, I guess I should never have said I
wanted to save Manston airport, this seems to have been translated into wanting
to be in the flight path of an airfreight hub that passengers can't fly from. I think the politicians seem to
have misjudged the difference between wanting to save a local airport that we
locals could fly from, to wanting a council cpo for a freight hub, which as far as I
can see from the figures is supported by about 2,500 people in the UK (the
number who signed the UK parliament petition) about 250 of which live within an
easy drive of Thanet, the most who have ever turned up at anything local
supporting the cpo.
Of course there are also all those locals who think this cpo is
for a regional airport, and don’t realise that the cpo would be for an
airfreight only hub. As one of those who is first out with the camera when a
plane flies over, running a bookshop with a large aviation section and
regularly visiting the aviation museums, I am now observing something a bit like the
ordinary churchgoer’s reaction when the evangelical born again Christians turn
up, when the pro cpo for a freight hub lot turn up.
The big question for candidates as TDC councillors who say
they will instigate a cpo as soon as they attain office is: Given that RiverOak
have said they will not pay the Manston site owner compensation if the cpo
fails, who would be liable for the compensation in the case of a failed cpo?
My
guess is that it would be us the taxpayer.
I guess aviation gaff of the day has to go to Cllr Dr Simon
Moores who having tweeted
He has been flying around the Thanet skies today flying a banner
1 favorite
More
You may have to click on the
imagines to see them, god alone knows what the point in flying an anti Labour
banner is, instead of flying a banner supporting some party or another.
The side effect of this one is that most of the people
who saw it seemed to think it was a pro Labour banner.
I guess this really all fits with our local politics,
which seems to be much more about keeping some party out of office than trying
to get some party with a good manifesto for Thanet elected.
So anyway while virtually every MP in the UK is
trying to stop aviation development in their constituencies because of the noise
and air pollution, in Thanet an airfreight hub is seen as a vote winner,
perhaps the first question is. Is it?
In fact, it's because if anyone complains to the electoral commission, because it says Vote Labour, it would in theory come out of their local campaign fund as all such things need to have a £ value. Does that sound right to you?
ReplyDeleteAs for the publicity, Daily Mirror (Twice) and Guido Fawkes + 3 political bookings off the back of it. Not a bad business investment for £100 of fuel
Simon does this mean you are going to do a banner for today’s Mirror offering advertising Angolmelo.com? I would imagine the £100 fuel investment likely to generate plenty of extra business flying banners in Europe.
ReplyDeleteNot today.. Have three more political banners already booked and perhaps even one over South Thanet on election day?
ReplyDelete