This is for the building that will form part of Granville House, objections need to sent by tomorrow.
This picture shows what they want to build.
With these objections it is partly the number of people who object that counts, so I wouldn’t worry too much that your objection makes a lot of sense or conforms to planning law. But if you don’t like the new plans, I doubt that the council will be able to do much about them unless they get quite a few objections.
My planning objection is below.
Planning objection
Dear Sir/Madam,
In the first instance could you kindly confirm your receipt
of this objection?
As a Ramsgate and Eastcliff ward resident I wish to object
to the following planning applications.
L/TH/12/1019 LAND
ADJACENT GRANVILLE HOUSE, VICTORIA PARADE, RAMSGATE, CT11 8DF
F/TH/12/1018 LAND
ADJACENT GRANVILLE HOUSE, VICTORIA PARADE, RAMSGATE, CT11 8DF
This development forms an extension to the grade II listed
Victorian building that fronted the whole block.
Most was designed by Edward Pugin although parts by J T
Wimperis all was built in the same Victorian Gothic style between 1867 and
1880.
Part of the development was demolished by a bomb in WW2 and
part demolished in the early 1980s to make way for a 1980s development that
didn’t occur.
Then in the early 2000s a completely different attitude to
the status of this important Victorian Gothic Pugin building was taken, and a
substantial part of it was rebuilt in the Victorian Gothic style, when the new
part was completed it was reclassified as a Grade II listed building and then
went on to win an award by Thanet District Council for attention to detail.
The current application has a strong resemblance to the
highly unsuitable 1980s plans that were abandoned and is devoid of any
sympathetic architectural detail.
I would like to object on the following grounds.
The whole reconstruction project should be in the same
architectural style, particularly as a considerable part already has been
rebuilt in that style.
There could have been a case for a modern and dramatic
design as the original was when first built, had part of the building not been
newly rebuilt in the original style
I can see no case for this proposal that has the look of
1980s economy and featureless buildings, designed around the popular plastic
double glazed windows of the time.
The proposed building uses a different bricklaying style to
the Flemish bond used in the rest of the building.
The proposed building has a glazed tower which appears to be
of a confrontational design to the existing tower.
It is important to remember that the relationship between
the Pugins and the town of Ramsgate already has a significant effect on the
local economy with the restoration of Pugin’s house The Grange and the current
restoration Pugin’s church. The way in which the remainder of Pugin’s Granville
House is rebuilt is likely to have a significant impact on Ramsgate’s heritage
and Regeneration.”
On the brickwork front
This is Flemish bond
This is what they want to use, stretcher bond
I have added a few more pictures for historical interest.
Incidentally here is the link fro live tweets from the council meeting https://twitter.com/GazetteMargate
I have added a few more pictures for historical interest.
Incidentally here is the link fro live tweets from the council meeting https://twitter.com/GazetteMargate












