The main issue this week has been the withdrawal of the
Development Consent Order to build an airfreight hub at Manston.
I think the most worrying factor here is that this DCO application
was put together by a reasonably good and professional team with previous DCO
experience and that the net result of the DCO process so far has been to change the Thanet
District Council administration to Conservative and cause Thanet to produce no Local
Plan giving something of a free for all for housing developers.
This (in big blue) is what the Planning Inspectorate have said so far:-
1. Any resubmission by the Applicant will be treated as a
new application for the purposes of the process. The Planning Inspectorate
would have up to 28 days to take its decision about whether the application
could be accepted for examination.
2. The Planning Inspectorate called the Applicant’s legal
representatives (BDB Law) on 1 May 2018, setting out its principal concerns in
respect of the application documents. Those concerns included:
• An absence of sufficient information within the application
documents upon which to the Planning Inspectorate could base a decision about
whether the Proposed Development constitutes a Nationally Significant
Infrastructure Project (NSIP) within the meaning in s23 of the Planning Act
2008.
• Gaps in the ecological, archaeological and ground
investigation survey data presented within the Environmental Statement (ES)
accompanying the application, which create uncertainty in the assessment of
likely significant effects.
• Inconsistencies/ omissions in the noise and vibration
assessment.
• The adequacy of the Transport Assessment accompanying the
ES.
• The adequacy of the Funding Statement.
On 3 May 2018 a teleconference was held between the Planning
Inspectorate, BDB Law and RiverOak Strategic Partners (RSP). During this
teleconference the Planning Inspectorate repeated its principal concerns
(above) in the presence of RSP, who confirmed their intention to withdraw the
application. Subsequently the application was formally withdrawn by letter
dated 4 May 2018.
Today (11 May 2018) a meeting took place between the
Planning Inspectorate and the Applicant at which the Inspectorate provided more
detailed s51 advice in respect of the concerns noted within the documents
associated with the withdrawn application. A note of the meeting is being
prepared and will be published in the usual way in due course.
Here is the link to this advice on the Planning Inspectorate’s
website https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/projects/south-east/manston-airport/?ipcsection=advice&ipcadvice=3755f4d631
Of course, we will have to wait to read the meeting note to
grasp all of it, but with so much wrong with the application it is difficult
not to assume that the applicant knew the application would fail when they
submitted it and what has actually happened is what they set out to achieve.
A few historic local pictures next
The bookshop being closed on Sunday we went to Canterbury where we did some shopping and stuff. I spent about half the time in Chocolate Cafe and the other half in bookshops. While I am on the bookshop subject here is the link to the books that went out in the bookshop yesterday mostly children's Ladybird Books and books about old busses.
I took a few photos of Canterbury, here is the link
Back to the DCO process I think the thing that hasn’t really
been understood properly by people commenting about it, is that the process is
front loaded and that this means that the applicant really has to have sorted
out the issues before submitting the application.
I am assuming that the next stage will be another round of consultation with revised documents, but who knows they may just revise the documents but not consult anyone, as far as I can see Canterbury and Ramsgate councils didn't even get told about the last round of consultation, let alone get to the stage where RiverOak entered into some sort of dialogue with them.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments, since I started writing this blog in 2007 the way the internet works has changed a lot, comments and dialogue here were once viable in an open and anonymous sense. Now if you comment here I will only allow the comment if it seems to make sense and be related to what the post is about. I link the majority of my posts to the main local Facebook groups and to my Facebook account, “Michael Child” I guess the main Ramsgate Facebook group is We Love Ramsgate. For the most part the comments and dialogue related to the posts here goes on there. As for the rest of it, well this blog handles images better than Facebook, which is why I don’t post directly to my Facebook account, although if I take a lot of photos I am so lazy that I paste them directly from my camera card to my bookshop website and put a link on this blog.