I think the key to Ramsgate’s local government problems is
that from the early days of tourism, say around 1740 the UK coastal resort
towns have competed for visitors from London and the other inland towns.
In the early days Ramsgate was governed from Sandwich which
slowly declined as a port town from around 1500 but wanted to continue getting
the port related revenues. The local government of Sandwich tried very hard to
prevent Ramsgate Harbour from being built during the early 1700s.
In this area Ramsgate’s main competition for visitors and
the associated wealth has been Margate, although the coastal towns further
away, Herne Bay, Deal, Folkestone and even Brighton have played a part.
Ramsgate’s main attraction from 1749 when the building of
the harbour started has been the combination of the large sandy beach with
water deep enough to swim in during the different levels of tide and the
harbour piers to walk along and survey the scene.
The mixture of the main sands and the royal harbour are
underlying assets which are very hard to equal elsewhere. I think that had
Ramsgate had the financial and resolve investment that Margate has had from the
council’s, Turner Contemporary with KCC and Dreamland with TDC are the main
examples, but this extends into the surrounding infrastructure and maintenance,
then Ramsgate would be reasonably successful at the moment.
I think the huge success in terms of the numbers of people
using the new Wetherspoon’s as a family leisure destination shows Ramsgate as
being held back from what it could and should be.
Historically one of the main factors in the fortunes of
seaside coastal towns has been their transport links to London and the rest of
the country. Up until 1815 when the paddle steamers produced the first cheap
and reliable service from London, it was carriage or sailing hoy.
I think that if money wasn’t an issue then taking a carriage
to Brighton was probably the best option for getting to the seaside before
1815. Margate and Ramsgate though did have the sailing hoy option, although
these were unreliable and made people seasick, the sand and Thanet’s good
climate helped both towns to develop.
During the Napoleonic wars, 1803 to 1815 Ramsgate developed
a considerable edge, because it was an officer training town and Ramsgate
Harbour was used as a troop transport port.
An officer in training, having bought a commission would
have normally been fairly wealthy and I would expect them to go to Ramsgate
with their family, servants, horses and rent a fairly substantial house.
In Ramsgate there would have already have been a reasonable
amount of this type of accommodation for the wealthy coming down for the cure,
see http://thanetonline.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/the-evolution-of-holiday-lifeboat-b-few.html
and
a lot more was built in the period between this print of 1791 and the first
properly surveyed map of 1822.
The map is best viewed on paper and you can look at it or
buy in the bookshop.
If you want to understand this period of our history I think
the main way of going about it is to read the local books published before
1850, as the cheap reprints of these are arranged in date order on our website,
this may be a starting point, here is the link http://www.michaelsbookshop.com/id17.htm
The books are split into history books written at the time
and are mostly focussed on looking back before 1750 and the guide books written
for what can loosely be described as tourists.
1815 was a key date in the tourist calendar of Thanet and
particularly Ramsgate where a social summer season had developed around
marrying off your daughter to a likely young officer.
The Napoleonic wars ended and the first paddle steamer
service started, this meant the beginning of cheap and reliable transport from
London to Thanet, giving us an edge over Brighton.
Initially the paddle steamers were reluctant to go round the
foreland, dispatching passengers at Margate, where the pier wasn’t long enough
for them to get to, into rowing boats.
Soon they made it to the end of the Ramsgate harbour piers
or arms, where the water was deep enough and Margate competed with a series of
jetties the first built in 1824.
Ramsgate was held back by politics as it was governed from
Sandwich, private development was successful in some cases the railway got to
Ramsgate in 1846, but I don’t think the Railways became a better option than
the paddle steamers until much later.
The railway got to Brighton 1841 and slowly the railway
became the preferred form of transport with Brighton being reliably closer to London
somewhere around 1865 when a transport infrastructure lead Thanet decline began.
I think he first economic indicator of this was Edward Pugin
building The Granville as seaside houses for the wealthy, their failure to
sell, their conversion to an hotel and eventually Pugin’s bankruptcy over houses
that would probably have sold in Brighton.
Meanwhile the people of Ramsgate oblivious to the decline in
aristocratic patronage but having very narrow and difficult streets leading to
the seafront were trying to wrest local government and the proceeds of the
rates away from the decaying town of Sandwich.
It wasn’t until 1884 that Ramsgate managed to get control of
its own governance, by 1904 most of the major improvements to the seafront had
been planned, financed and constructed.
These improvements which were made by Ramsgate council included,
the red brick arches by the harbour, the Pulhamite outcroppings and waterfall
of Madeira Walk, the widening of harbour parade and building The Royal Victoria
Pavilion.
I think this ongoing improvement the building of Westcliff
Hall, opened in 1914, the widening of the shopping streets in the town, the
development to the Westcliff with its Pulhamite bridge and outcroppings,
building the Marina swimming pool went on until WW2.
Post war reconstruction was a bit patchy, with nearly as
much damage done by various development schemes as the war. With attractive
buildings or parts of the town that you can see in old photos but have gone now
and initially assumed to be the result of the blitz actually having demolished
to make way for some very ugly modern buildings.
There has been a lot of the building of housing designed by
architects who wouldn’t want to live in it themselves, much of this for the
local councils, often under the disguise of some housing association or
another.
I think the problem of local government and it’s impact on
Ramsgate isn’t just as simple as TDC taking over Ramsgate Borough Council. Some
of pretty dreadful things like the demolition of Eastcliff Lodge, Sanger’s and
the harbour frontage between Leopold Street and Harbour Street happened under
the old Ramsgate Council administration.
There has been a transition in local government, perhaps a
further extension of Parkinson’s law, where a lot of the officers with
specialist abilities in maintaining and designing a good infrastructure are
slowly changing towards officers with specialist abilities in maintaining and
designing a good career for themselves.
There has also been a timewarp view towards developing
Ramsgate as a sort of industrial transport centre in a sort of hope that something
like Sally lines or Hoverspeed could happen. This seems to operate completely
outside of environmental and UK infrastructure changes during the last forty
years.
Obviously Margate is and has been Ramsgate’s main rival as a
town and governing Ramsgate from Margate is bound to lead to serious problems
for Ramsgate. There is an area where visitors who are put off going to Ramsgate
may go to Margate and spend their money there instead. This gets more critical
as council investment in Margate reaches levels where the council has more
imperative to see it pay off.
I suppose that if transport hub development did make a town
in this area work then Dover town would be a success story, but I don’t think
this is the case.
With anything industrial or transport related there is the
economic scale to balance, with the pollution on the one side and the economic
benefit on the other. If Ramsgate is to ever revive in terms of a leisure
destination then noise and air pollution would have to be kept to a minimum.
But this leads to some very difficult questions.
Do we want to attract more people to Ramsgate?
Do we want to attract them to holiday here? Just visit for
the day? Come here to live?
Or do we, the people who already live here just want to make
Ramsgate better for us?
Do we want to attract quality employers here? If we do does
this mean we will also have to find living space for their employees?
Do we want to return to some particular period of time?
I suppose another way of looking at this is to try and
visualise aspects of Ramsgate in the future.
Do we have sufficient attractions to entertain a family for
a day? Put them all together, the tunnels tour, maritime museum, steam tug,
remaining shops, cafes, I would guess if it’s a wet day, just about.
Of course when the weather is good, seaside towns are good
places to be.
So what would I do?
I think in the first instance I would look towards
protecting the sand repairing the groynes particularly on the sands side of the
east pier, which went a long way towards stopping the main sands being swept
away in the winter storms. The artificial beach, western under cliff groynes.
I would also get a proper flood risk assessment of the
Pleasurama site, something that I think would probably mean that it wasn’t
worth land banking it anymore.
I think I would give up on the port side of the harbour
completely, looking at finding a way to make the Port Ramsgate site much more
leisure orientated.
Perhaps were the council to put the money it spends on Port Ramsgate into leisure based Ramsgate projects we could at least have something interesting to do.
I suppose a big issue is having a group of people who have
some sort of vision for the future, I do wonder if this exists in our local
politicians, what are they hoping for?
There is the area where local individuals could do something too, you could do something like I did, sell up and rent a local shop and have a go at doing something in it. Bet honestly I wouldn't know what to sell, I did notice a shop in King Street opened a couple of days ago selling kitchens, which is something I wouldn't have thought of.
I think ultimately most of what happens to improve Ramsgate will probably come from the people who live here trying different things, local groups seem to flounder in disagreement.
Just a final note, my laptop has just died so I will be operating with phone only until I get it sorted out, so reduced service on the weekend response front.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments, since I started writing this blog in 2007 the way the internet works has changed a lot, comments and dialogue here were once viable in an open and anonymous sense. Now if you comment here I will only allow the comment if it seems to make sense and be related to what the post is about. I link the majority of my posts to the main local Facebook groups and to my Facebook account, “Michael Child” I guess the main Ramsgate Facebook group is We Love Ramsgate. For the most part the comments and dialogue related to the posts here goes on there. As for the rest of it, well this blog handles images better than Facebook, which is why I don’t post directly to my Facebook account, although if I take a lot of photos I am so lazy that I paste them directly from my camera card to my bookshop website and put a link on this blog.